Comments on: Notes from Chicago http://www.matthewsim.com/weblog/17/ Clever name pending. Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:18:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on Notes from Chicago by: H. E. Kerfoot http://www.matthewsim.com/weblog/17/#comment-106 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.matthewsim.com/weblog/17/#comment-106 Matthew, just thought I'd let you know that I'd buy that Lingerie Barbie. In fact, I have several. I've been a collector of Barbie dolls since the early '90s and the quality of this line is great! I don't see the doll as "sexy," since it is an inanimate object. And, you must admit, the doll shows less than some Victoria's Secret models. Matthew, just thought I’d let you know that I’d buy that Lingerie Barbie. In fact, I have several. I’ve been a collector of Barbie dolls since the early ’90s and the quality of this line is great! I don’t see the doll as “sexy,” since it is an inanimate object. And, you must admit, the doll shows less than some Victoria’s Secret models.

]]> Comment on Notes from Chicago by: Sean http://www.matthewsim.com/weblog/17/#comment-105 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.matthewsim.com/weblog/17/#comment-105 Somewhere along the line I think people have started acknowledging that the distinction between "soft porn" (maxim, fhm, et.al.) and "real" porn (playboy, whoohooo!) is pretty flimsy ( about 2mm of silk to be exact ). I haven't figured out whether this is just a ploy of the shopkeepers to make me feel tawdry, or if there really is no distinction between enjoying nudity and enjoying semi-nudity... hmmmm. Somewhere along the line I think people have started acknowledging that the distinction between “soft porn” (maxim, fhm, et.al.) and “real” porn (playboy, whoohooo!) is pretty flimsy ( about 2mm of silk to be exact ).

I haven’t figured out whether this is just a ploy of the shopkeepers to make me feel tawdry, or if there really is no distinction between enjoying nudity and enjoying semi-nudity… hmmmm.

]]>